Friday, October 11, 2013

"Frank Olsen, the CIA agent who committed suicide while on LSD that was given to him by the CIA without his knowledge..."

From an unnamed and undated page found in a scrapbook of Timothy Leary's

Actually, Olsen was a bio-chemical scientist at Fort Detrick, Maryland, headquarters for the military’s biological warfare research and development program, also known as germ warfare, who either jumped, fell or was pushed out of a mid-town Manhattan hotel window three weeks after being surreptitiously dosed with LSD.
Frank Olson was dead at the age of 43. Investigators determined that he had either jumped or fallen to his death, something a young Eric Olsen had trouble reconciling:
"I remember as a nine year old, and actually for years after that I was completely stumped and dumbfounded by trying to resolve that alternative. There's a big difference between a fall or a jump and I couldn't understand how either of them could've occurred.” Source
jump-fall-pushed

This is analogous to the compound word formed after the Jonestown, Guyana commune deaths to describe

murder-suicide

which is a designation that reflects an unwillingness to determine between the two. But by this token, we should form another compound word:

survivor-perpetrator

to describe the media mouthpieces who have served the narrative for 35 years now. But since the scant study afterward at least determined in an official conclusion that 80 percent of the deaths were indeed murder, it is reprehensible for journalists and their sources today to refer, more often then not, to Jonestown victims solely as "suicides." It is my opinion, from the mood apparent in the video taken of the pop concert the night before the mass death, that nobody was even hungover, let alone suicidally so.

Aside from alcohol, the long-standing corollary for suicide in our culture has been financial distress, a condition especially prevalent in 19th and early 20th century America, when gruesome examples ultimately forced the creation of a social safety-net. I find it hard to relate to the Peoples Temple, who had plenty of resources with which to fight their existential battle with the CIA., which is the real meaning in hiring Mark Lane just a few weeks beforehand.  Imagine being paranoid and poor.

In  this live context totally devoid of cause and effect; of sensible leadership, and appropriate submission; of anyone taking responsibility for their own, let alone their community's actions, I guess it should make sense that millions of dollars in cash, jewelry, bullion, and marketable securities and pharmaceuticals would be left to pilferers and plunderers. If you really cared that your millions of dollars went to the Soviet embassy and not your ungrateful daughter, do you wait till the final hour to hand-write a few paragraphs, when the wishes won't work? Do you care if Viola Burnham flies in and steals your jewelry? diigo, (I don't. She can have mine.)





Rev. Jim's Rainbow Family for the Future




There comes a time when we hear a certain call
When the world must come together as one
There are people dying
And its time to lend a hand to life
The greatest gift of all

We can't go on pretending day by day
That someone, somehow will soon make a change
We are all a part of Gods great big family
And the truth, you know,
Love is all we need

[Chorus]
We are the world, we are the children
We are the ones who make a brighter day
So lets start giving
There's a choice we're making
We're saving our own lives
Its true we'll make a better day
Just you and me

Send them your heart so they'll know that someone cares
And their lives will be stronger and free
As God has shown us by turning stones to bread
So we all must lend a helping hand

[Chorus]

When you're down and out, there seems no hope at all
But if you just believe there's no way we can fall well well well well
Let us realize that a change can only come
When we stand together as one



This reminds me: poor Michael Jackson didn't receive an open-casket funeral. although he died young and left a beautiful corpses.  Generoso Pope seems to appreciate the politics between the open-closed controversy.





















The Holy Grail of Limited Hangouts





Thursday, October 10, 2013

Los Angeles Dodgers Win the 1981 World Series


October 29, 1981, Los Angeles Herald Examiner, page B1, Los Angeles Dodgers Win the 1981 World Series


L.A.'s on top of the world!


A very nice thing for the psychonaut Timothy Leary--who usually went "out of this world," when tuning in, turning on, and dropping out--to have preserved for posterity, and it is turning me on as an individual right now. But it is in its collective mood of joy that it is a tonic to my recent immersion in the city-wide mood of late 1970's San Francisco.

And whether winning or losing, this is the field where the real racial integration and reconciliation was taking place in America, while the most segregated hour to gather in our pluralistic society being---as Dr. Martin Luther King memorably put it---eleven o'clock, Sunday mornings.







Timothy's Scrapebook



From one of Timothy Leary's Scrapbooks, Maintained at Archive.org









Timothy Leary's Death Mask, in a Tiffany-Blue Box



I believe Leary tore this double page so as to create a backwards-facing Vagina Portal, to enhance its message, and carry the meaning across the decades to us. 




August 11, 1979, San Francisco Chronicle, page 4, Tenderloin Sex Pit Full of Human Garbage; Broken, Rotting. Stained, Empty, Unmentionable Lower Intestine.

The FBI, which suffered the worst day of violence in its 71-year history Thursday, yesterday pressed the largest manhunt ever in Ohio (Isn't that pronounced 'Iowa?') for the fugitive accused of killing one of the three slain agents.
69


White Nights

Klan Marches Past a Tragic Milestone

A ragtag band of Ku Klux Klansmen marching to Montgomery for "white rights," crossed the spot yesterday where civil rights worker Viola Liuzzi was shot and killed by Klan nightriders 14 years ago.

White Rights

Dan White - Dan Right - Dan Rather

Milestone - Manhunt -



FBI Presses Huge Manhunt in Ohio

They were called the tenderloins because they were the richest precincts for cops to rake in the graft.

The suspect, Melvin Bay Guyon, 19, eluded capture in the shooting death of special agent Johnnie L. Oliver by jumping through a window and fleeing on a stolen bicycle.

Oliver, 35, married and the father of three children, was the first agent assigned to Cleveland to be killed in the line of duty.

I might have imagined that Cleveland was one of those cities that were run as tight ships

The other two FBI agents killed Thursday were shot to death in their El Centro office by a former social worker who then put a pistol in his mouth and committed suicide.

James Maloney, 30, -- who killed agents Charles W. Elmore, 34, and J. Robert Porter, 44, was apparently bent on suicide. He left...

Authorities said federal agents and police numbering about 150 were systematically checking more than 200 leads in Oliver's death, with the search focusing on the east side ghetto.

Authorities said Oliver was shot through the heart when..he....and....o,th..er agents attempted...

My condolences to the families' of the agents who were lost---but, I mean...come on!---Let's also hear it for the perp too!  This guy must have been pedaling! It's like he's a liminal precursor to both our O.J. Simpson and Rodney King cases--then he gets a first-ever credit, like high school in Little Rock.

. They've moved on past giving out a charge for the young man's being in custody in the first place, so it's likely to be lightweight enough to add a further element of embarrasment to the open window and bicycle details---kind of like the Secret Service's resorting to prostitutes when guarding the President abroad
















With an emphasis on Clean Air and Sun Shine.


Cover Your Lion In Photos

 This Page Was Torn To Resemble a Vagina Portel




August 11, 1979, San Francisco Chronicle, page 3, Cult Inquiry Hears a Key Witness,

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

February 4, 2008, San Francisco Magazine, My Name is Jim Jones, by Pamela Feinsilber,

February 4, 2008, San Francisco Magazine, My Name is Jim Jones, by Pamela Feinsilber,

Twenty-five years after an infamous San Francisco cult leader led his followers to Guyana and later ordered the largest murder-suicide in modern history, the adopted son who carries his name is...

Fourteen months before the horrific events the world has come to call Jonestown, Jimmy Jones was spending the night in the jungle, sobbing. His brother Stephan loved the dense, endless growth of trees and plants that surrounded the compound named after their father, where they lived with about 1,000 other members of their father's congregation. Some people have an affinity for a certain type of geography, and Stephan found that in the tropical woodlands of Guyana, in South America. Jimmy didn't. He hated the jungle. What was the appeal to sleeping in the bush when he had a comfortable bed back in one of the cottages? He was there, with his friend Johnny Cobb, because his father had asked them to do this. By morning, everyone he knew—his parents, his brothers and sister, his first love, Yvette—could be dead. But Jimmy, with Johnny, was a "designated survivor." His father had chosen him to live.

No one said no to Jim Jones, but for Jimmy, adopted when he was ten weeks old, it was easy to say yes. Jimmy was 16, normally a rebellious age, yet he believed in his father's vision. So did everyone he knew. It was exciting to be building a new world here in Jonestown. Stephan might see the negative side of things, but Stephan was an unhappy guy, while Jimmy was having a pretty good time. They'd always had a rivalry going, and Stephan had already learned not to criticize their dad to Jimmy, who would just tell on him. Jimmy would never dream of questioning his father. Especially now, when Jonestown was under attack.

Earlier that day, when Jim Jones called, "Alert! Alert! Alert!" over the public-address system, everyone had hurried to the big, open-sided pavilion. A group of worried relatives in California had sent a lawyer to Guyana, who was talking to the government, saying people were trapped in Jonestown. Both paranoid and manipulative, Jones exaggerated the threat; and tonight, he told his followers, their "fascist" enemy was just outside the gates. He ordered all who could to smear their faces with mud, pick up a weapon—one of the ancient guns, a knife, a pitchfork, a crossbow—and make a circle around the compound to fight the armed men awaiting them. Jones had been testing their loyalty for years: Commitment to their cause, and to Father—everyone called Jones Father—demanded nothing less than "revolutionary suicide," if it came to that. Better to die together than to be split apart.

But that evening, Jimmy and Johnny had a different task. They were given a trunk containing gold and American money and told to bury it in the jungle, then make their way home to San Francisco to tell the story of Jonestown. The boys walked around the defense perimeter saying good-bye. Then they went deep into the jungle and cried all night long, alone with the sound of the crickets, the howling baboons, the frogs and night birds.

There was no attack, of course. Jones had threatened mass suicide if the authorities disturbed him and his followers, and the lawyer went home. When Jim Jones Jr., now living happily with his own family in Pacifica, looks back on that terrifying night, he doesn't convey shame or guilt that he would have been spared. He doesn't bemoan how deluded he'd been, express rage that good people were told such a monstrous lie or sorrow that he didn't see where his father's madness would end. All he remembers is the vast joy and relief he felt when he learned that "negotiations" had averted the crisis. He was still "in the bubble" of his father's power, and the powerful dream he preached.

An African American, Jimmy believed that if he hadn't been adopted by Jim Jones, his life would likely have been one of drugs or poverty or crime. In this way, his story reflects that of his father's followers. The majority of people who joined Jones's Peoples Temple were also poor or working class and black, from deteriorating neighborhoods and broken families, their lives taken over by a man offering a better way of life.

Jones had gathered his flock with a deeply attractive message: They could create a society where everyone was equal and people took care of one another. Jonestown was to be a living example of that, a Christian, socialist Utopia. And perhaps it might have become a thriving community had it not had another purpose: to put Jones's flock beyond the reach of anyone's questions. And one more: to keep the group together, which is another way of saying to keep anyone else from leaving him. No one realized just how important that had become to the Reverend Jim Jones. His followers already attributed him with knowledge and powers beyond that of normal men. In Guyana he became their sole means of information. By coming to Jonestown, they gave up their autonomy—not just their homes and jobs and families in the Bay Area, not just their money and their passports, but the ability to think for themselves. If Father said they were being attacked, who among them could refute it?

The following year, in mid-November 1978, members of the group called Concerned Relatives came to Jonestown with Congressman Leo Ryan, of San Mateo. Jones begged to be left in peace, but when Ryan's group departed, so did a family named Parks. Convinced his grand vision would come undone if even a few people broke away, Jones sent some of his followers to kill Ryan—which they did, along with two NBC reporters, a photographer from the San Francisco Examiner, and Patricia Parks. Then Jones gathered his flock for another suicide drill. Only this time, it wasn't a drill.

They were gentle grandmothers and helpless babies, hardworking parents who wanted to spare their kids the bigotry they had known, once-troubled teens who found purpose in communal life, open-hearted boys and girls who might have grown up to be anything. It seems to need saying that each one's life had value when what we remember is a widely published photograph of anonymous bodies.

This is what people think of when they hear the word Jonestown: More than 900 men, women, and children lying side by side around an open-air pavilion, puffing up like balloons in the tropical heat after drinking from a vat of poisoned Kool-Aid.

Like a tremendous earthquake, that image sent waves of shock and horror around the world. The epicenter wasn't really Guyana, though; it was San Francisco. After gathering converts from all over the country, Jones had based his Peoples Temple in the Fillmore district. Most of those who died in Guyana—almost 70 percent of whom were African American—had been living in San Francisco.

Jimmy and a handful of others had been in Guyana's capital, Georgetown, during Ryan's visit to Jonestown. So in an odd way, he was a designated survivor after all. But just as rehearsed the year before, he lost his loved ones, including Yvette, by then his wife. To this day, Jim Jones Jr. isn't sure what he would have done had he been there with the others. Yet even with those unanswerable questions and that infamous name, he's created a life remarkable for its ordinariness: suburban husband and father, successful pharmaceuticals salesman, registered Republican, Catholic churchgoer, kids' basketball coach, well-liked neighbor and friend.

On this 25th anniversary, he is being interviewed for a documentary film, a play, and, of course, for this story. He's doing all this for his sons—to add to the more dispassionate historical record—and because he feels that, after all these years, he's come to understand something important. "We all have Jonestowns in our lives," he believes. "Take my story, look at all the ugly parts, and some of the beautiful parts, and take from it that you can come out of something and be whoever you want to be. You can accomplish whatever you want to accomplish. It's all within. You know what I mean?"

"I wasn't going to be what everybody expected me to be," he has said of his life after Jonestown, "a tweaked-out, weird person who couldn't assimilate in society. Out of the great misery that people have endured, isn't it the best tribute to those loved ones we lost to try and live a better life?"

Now 43, he is tall, good-looking, upbeat, and warm—someone people like to be around. He laughs and jests, even about Jonestown, and the inevitable Kool-Aid jokes. When he talks about loss, his demeanor is solemn, not anguished; he isn't a tortured soul, bearing a burden of guilt and remorse. "I like to remember the positive things," he says. "The positive things will make me grow. The negative things will only make me dwell on things I can't change."

You can't refute the logic, but during five long conversations, I found it difficult to comprehend his lack of emotion. The astute New Yorker writer Lawrence Wright, who wrote about Jim and his two surviving brothers ten years ago, told me, "There were moments I felt frustrated interviewing him because I wanted more affect, more feeling for what he had gone through."

And yet very, very few of us have experienced anything remotely like what happened in Jonestown. People cope with cataclysmic tragedy in different ways. Growing up with Jim Jones, bearing "the gift of his name," Jimmy learned compassion, ambition, the importance of working with others toward a better life for all. At the same time, his father taught him not to respect emotion, and Jimmy's intense gratitude to this man kept him from seeing anything he didn't want to see. After November 18, 1978, those deep-seated habits helped him to concentrate on the future and remember the good things from his past—to build a new life and avoid wallowing in despair. Strange but true, being adopted helped Jim Jones Jr. bear the burden of Jonestown.

He began life in Indiana as Larry Allen Knox, born in 1960 to a 14-year-old girl who put him in an orphanage. Ten weeks later, a white minister and his wife, Marceline, adopted him and gave him his new father's name: He would be James Warren Jones Jr.

The Joneses had already adopted a part-Native American nine-year-old, as well as three Amerasian orphans who were born in Korea. Marceline was pregnant when one of the three, Stephanie, age five, died in a car crash with several Temple members in 1959. She gave birth to a son soon afterward, and they named him Stephan. "He's homemade," Jim says with what he describes as his "little sense of macabre humor." "The rest of us are takeouts." Several years later, the family adopted a Caucasian boy Stephan's age; until then, Jimmy completed what they called their Rainbow Family.

Jim Jones, then 29, was the pastor of a Pentecostal church established four years earlier, the Peoples Temple. He was committed to both liberal ideals and a bigger ministry, and eventually he found his constituency in the kind of inner-city neighborhood Jimmy was from. Jones had studied evangelical ministers at work in tent meetings all over Indiana. By 1960, he had refined his spellbinding delivery of shout-filled sermons, fervid prayers, emotion-draining faith healings and acts of clairvoyance—all, he claimed, the work of the Holy Spirit. He was charismatic and convincing, because at times he believed in his superior powers himself. Peoples Temple was one of the first churches in the country with an interracial congregation. Its social activism was another draw: Members of the Temple gave coal or rent money to those who needed it, worked a busy soup kitchen.

In 1960, it wasn't unusual to be called a "nigger lover" for crusading against injustice, for having an integrated congregation or an African American baby. Even then, however, Jones exaggerated or completely faked attacks against him: bomb scares, broken windows, death threats. It was a way of gaining publicity and converts, but it also added to his stress and paranoia. Jones began suffering collapses, which Marceline, a nurse, knew sometimes lacked a physical cause but helped him to cover up. She was the first of many to hide his deceit and weakness from the world. In their exhaustive 1982 biography Raven: The Untold Story of the Rev. Jim Jones and His People, Tim Reiterman (a former Examiner reporter who was in Guyana with Ryan) and John Jacobs say that Marceline had wanted to leave her husband early on. Loyalty, the stigma of divorce, and, later, Jones's threat to separate her from her children kept her in the marriage. She died with the others at Jonestown, part victim, part abettor.

By 1962, Jones's diffuse fears had coalesced around nuclear annihilation. After reading, inEsquire, about the safest places to be in the event of a nuclear attack, he moved his family to Belo Horizonte, Brazil, for two years. Temple membership dwindled while they were gone, and in 1965, Jones took the family and the remnants of his congregation, about 150 people, to rural Redwood Valley, near Ukiah, 100 miles north of San Francisco.

Jim says he had "a great childhood"—a deceptively simple phrase laden with positive thoughts, gratitude, and a preference not to dwell on his father's flaws. "I worked hard to be number one," he says. "I don't think my father loved me more than the others. I think I brought him more joy because I was always grateful for everything he did." What he remembers is tree houses, swimming pools, playing basketball with his brothers. He didn't even mind the long weekend bus trips into San Francisco, where his father preached at a temple on Geary Boulevard. He would do his homework on the bus, and one year, he says proudly, even with all that traveling, he never missed a day of school.

In the early seventies, the congregation bought 11 Greyhound buses and began taking them around the country for old-fashioned summer revival meetings, from Houston to New York and Detroit. The buses rolled through the poorer parts of town, gathering converts as they went. Sometimes Jimmy preached. When he was about 12, his dad took him to see a documentary movie called Marjoe, about the strange life of a child preacher named Marjoe Gortner. As an adult, Gortner was disillusioned and bitter, but what Jones wanted Jimmy to take away was how he'd been "able to motivate and strike excitement in the audiences," Jim says. "You want to grow up and be like your father, and here was a way I was gonna be like him, except different from my brothers."

The heart of Jimmy's sermon was the riveting tale of how his father had snatched him from death. When Jimmy was six, the family had set out to go bowling in Willits, about ten miles from their home. As their old Vista Cruiser station wagon crossed Highway 101, a car broadsided them. Jimmy had the severest injuries. He remembers being pulled from the backseat "and my father coming to comfort me, 'cause I thought I was gonna die." In the hospital, Jones told him that he did die, and that his prayers had brought his son back to life.

When he preached, Jimmy would recount this story as testimony to his father's healing powers. "If you're told something as a child, you always believe it. When you're 12, up there speaking in front of 5,000 people—I mean, I didn't have to be good, I just had to be sincere, and I was. I thought my dad had divine powers."

At the revival meetings, he was among the best at collecting offerings. "Think about it. You're going out in the black community in Houston, and you have your son come up and give a sermon, your African American son with the name Jim Jones—don't you see the draw there? But I didn't see it that way at the time." How does he feel about it now? "I feel good about it," he says, "because I believed in what Peoples Temple was trying to do."

Temple members were persuaded that a worthy end justified the means of achieving it, and the Reverend Jones was adept at coercing and intimidating people into staying with the flock. As in Indianapolis, he magnified the hostility of the outside world, conditioning his followers to feel that at any time they could be attacked by the materialistic, reactionary world. Competing for followers with militant groups like the Black Panthers, Jones began styling himself like one of their leaders, complete with armed security and personal guards.

In 1972, he moved his church and his family to San Francisco, where he bought a former Scottish rite temple next door to a Black Muslim mosque on Geary just off Fillmore. By then, Tim, the white son of a Temple member, was living with the Rainbow Family. He and Stephan were 13, Jimmy almost 12, the only children still at home. Once more, what Jim recalls is having fun: playing basketball, going to $1 matinees with his friends, working at the Temple's summer youth camp, where he met Yvette Muldrow, his first girlfriend.

Perhaps because Yvette was African American and talk of black liberation was in the air, Jimmy went next door and joined the Nation of Islam youth group. It was a short-lived foray into his roots. A few months later, his grandmother Lynetta Jones gave him a car, which he was told he couldn't accept because the Nation of Islam did not take gifts from Caucasians. That's when, Jim says with a laugh, "I realized black is only skin-deep."

While Jimmy was playing ball and going to movies, his father was courting the San Francisco power structure. Jim Jones was like a ward boss; when people were needed at demonstrations or for election work, he could deliver them by the busload. In return, he pushed for a political post, and in 1976, mayor George Moscone named him to the San Francisco Housing Authority. Jones quickly became chairman, and, packed with his supporters, the meetings became more like rallies. There were other good photo ops, too, when prominent Democrats or activists such as Moscone, then state assemblyman Willie Brown, then governor Jerry Brown, Angela Davis, and Jane Fonda visited the Temple.

A hypochondriac to begin with, Jones was already taking fistfuls of medication: painkillers, barbiturates, amphetamines, which accentuated his feelings of paranoia, his tendency to self-aggrandizement. Whether seduced by power or by a genuine belief in his vision, the members of his inner circle—all Caucasian—overlooked or hid his weaknesses, collaborated in his deceptions. And, even as he sat with Moscone or Willie Brown, Jones was preparing to move his congregation again. As early as 1974, an advance group was clearing land and building cabins on the 3,824 acres of land that Jones had leased in the far north of Guyana.

The plan was to move the congregation there slowly, with Temple headquarters remaining in San Francisco. But Jones's claims of healing the sick and raising the dead—and disturbing descriptions by former members of the regimentation, fear, and self-imposed humiliation they'd experienced—were bringing the type of publicity Jones couldn't control. In the spring and summer of 1977, New West magazine was preparing a feature article, using the stories of ten defectors to counterpoint Jones's political rise; the San Francisco Examiner was researching two long stories; and in mid-July, District Attorney Joseph Freitas began investigating Temple activities. Temple members started quietly disappearing from San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Ukiah, and by September almost 1,000 people had relocated to Guyana.

When Jimmy first visited Guyana, in 1975, it made Redwood Valley look like an overbuilt metropolis. "The jungle was so thick Tarzan couldn't swing through it," he says with a laugh. On moving there with his family two years later, when he was 16, he was amazed at all the work that had been done. The early settlers had created a well-planned, sturdy compound, with 60 wooden cottages and five single-sex dormitories, two canvas-roofed school buildings, a nursery and a preschool, a huge communal kitchen and pantry, an infirmary, a laundry, a radio room, and a large, open-sided pavilion where people would gather in the evenings.

Again, Jim's memories center on having fun, with his brothers, particularly Tim, and his friends from San Francisco. Yvette, whose sister and brother-in-law had brought her into the Temple, was there, too, and the two would take long walks along the river, under an inky sky in which "you could count every star." Many Temple members complained of being underfed, but Jim says there was plenty of food: "A lot of rice, a lot of chicken—using all the parts, as you would in a native country—a lot of pork. It was food that you would eat in South America: okra, cassava, string beans. You worked hard, but you could see what you produced."

He liked the idea of "building a better world," but not the heat and the jungle, and he was glad to get away every chance he could. Jones's oldest son, Korean-born Lew, whose baby was the first child born in Jonestown, never opposed his father, but neither was he entrusted with a leadership position. Jimmy, three years younger than Lew, was part of the security team. One of his father's personal guards, he left Jonestown whenever his dad did, every three months or so: "I worked my avenues out." He never identified with the masses of colonists. "Individuals were not important; the group was more important. In my mind," he says, "I justified leaving with my father by saying I served the organization better by not being there."

His friend Johnny Cobb was also on the security team, the reason, Jim says, they were picked to go into the jungle that frightening evening in 1977. This was the first White Night. Gradually, the term came to apply less to self-defense than to suicide. Jim says his father called on his followers at least a dozen times to drink something that might contain poison. "It was a testimony of faith." As a member of the security team, he could simply slip away, sometimes to take a walk with Yvette.

Stephan and, later, Tim came to recognize the fakery and lies, the overwork, deprivation, and physical and sexual abuse, that Jones used to maintain control. (The worst form of punishment was probably the "sensory isolation box," a four-foot-high packing crate into which those in disfavor might be put for as long as a week.) "My two brothers had more clarity on that," Jim says. "I think they focused on all the negative things about my father. I believed in what he was trying to accomplish. I mean, what did Peoples Temple stand for? A multiracial community of people working to help others."

And here was an easy way to be the one Dad loved best. Jones had persuaded his flock that he needed sexual release more than other men did, and he took lovers of either sex whenever he wished. One day, Stephan thought he saw Jones with his, Stephan's, girlfriend. He made the mistake of telling Jimmy, and Jimmy told their father.

That December, Jimmy's grandmother Lynetta Jones died. She had made her way to Jonestown a few months earlier and never recovered from the trip. Jim Jones had been using drugs for years, and with his mother—perhaps the one person who might have restrained him—gone, he started taking antidepressants along with his mammoth ingestion of uppers and downers. As his health began disintegrating, so did his mental state.

Meanwhile, people were crammed into the cabins and dormitories, and the meals had deteriorated. Jimmy might have eaten well enough, but others less privileged were losing a lot of weight. It wasn't only the limited food; it was the sunup-to-sundown hard labor, maintaining the crops and the compound. And the lack of sleep: At night, Jones was constantly haranguing the colonists about their "enemies" over the public-address system.

By the fall of 1978, Jones's influence over Tim and Stephan had waned considerably, but they didn't know who they could talk to about it. Jimmy wasn't the only one who focused on the end, not the means; the vision, not the reality. As Reiterman and Jacobs wrote in Raven, "[The colonists] had given up so much to come to Jonestown that to even contemplate trouble in paradise would be incapacitating. It was far easier to blame themselves for failing to be contented amid impossible surroundings."
In their different ways, Jimmy and Lew remained loyal to the end. In September, Jones sent Jimmy to work with his dedicated agent in Georgetown, Sharon Amos, to help cultivate good relations with the government. For a time, Yvette was there, too. On October 1, Jimmy turned 18, and they married; he remembers thinking, "It doesn't get any better than this." Now pregnant, Yvette wanted to stay with him, but he sent her back to Jonestown to be with her sister. At the time, it seemed like what a committed socialist would do, putting his own happiness aside for the community.

By then, the Concerned Relatives had interested liberal U.S. representative Leo Ryan in making a "fact-finding" visit to Guyana. Two months later, he was preparing to fly there with 14 of the relatives, two lawyers, a news crew, and two of his aides (one of them now state senator Jackie Speier) when Stephan, Tim, and six others left Jonestown to join Jimmy in Georgetown. The brothers had arranged a basketball tournament with Guyana's Olympic team. The first game took place on November 13, and, completely outmatched, the Jonestown team lost by 30 points. When Ryan arrived, on the 15th, Jones ordered the group to come back. Even Stephan and Tim failed to grasp how dangerously irrational their father had become. After their miserable showing, the team members had been training as hard as they could, and, speaking for the group, Stephan refused to leave.

The Jones sons met Ryan that evening in Georgetown. Jim says they were excited he was there. "We thought, ‘This will clear up all the issues if people want to leave.' Then we could go on with what we were trying to create." Later that night, the second basketball game took place, and this time, Jimmy's team lost by 20 points. Ryan and some of his group took a tiny chartered plane to Port Kaituma, six miles by boat from Jonestown, on the 17th. That night, as Ryan's group ate dinner in the open-sided pavilion, entertained by singers and the Jonestown band, the basketball team was playing its third game in Georgetown. Jimmy was the center, and his rebounding skills helped keep the game close. Eventually, the team lost, but this time, it was by only ten points. Exhilarated, they radioed their father about the game, but his mind was somewhere else.

The next day, November 18, when most of the players were at a movie, a radio transmission came in from Jonestown. Something was going to happen, Jones told Jimmy. He had sent his "avenging angels" after Ryan's group to make sure "the persecution" didn't continue. At the airstrip, Ryan, three members of the press, including Greg Robinson of the San Francisco Examiner, and the woman leaving with her family were shot and killed. At Jonestown, the colonists again heard Jones calling, "Alert! Alert! Alert!" over the public-address system. Once they had gathered at the pavilion, he told them, "They won't leave us alone. They're now going back to tell more lies, which means more congressmen, and there's no way, no way, we can survive."

Jones taped all of his speeches, even, amazingly, this one. At first, surely many or most assumed it was another suicide drill. In Raven, there is a chilling photograph of a note written before or after one such test: "If the potion we drank had been the real thing, then it would have been the end of Dad's pain. He would not have to suffer for us anymore....We would be in peace today....There would be no more toots of the horn or talking about strategy. If it was real, of course we would have been free. We would have died the best way....Thank you Dad for the test and for not letting us suffer."

Some must have felt they had severed all lifelines to a home outside the jungle. Jim acknowledges they were "sleep-deprived, isolated, and manipulated." With armed guards surrounding them, they were ordered to drink from a vat of cyanide-laced grape Fla-Vor-Aid. Once the first died, events must have gained a nightmarish inexorability. Some went willingly, after poisoning the 275 children. Others did not. Lew Jones was one of the last to die. Walking around the camp with a gun, making sure everyone was dead, he'd been given an important job at last.

When Jones made his final call to Georgetown, he had told his sons, "We're going to see Mrs. Frazier," the code phrase meaning that all those in Jonestown were going to die. "I asked if there was another way to deal with this," says Jim, "and his response was, ‘You know your responsibility; you know your duty.'" Jones asked if the brothers had any poison or other means of killing themselves. Jimmy kept repeating, "Is this real? Is this real?"

Trying to find out what had happened at the compound was "a nightmare of nightmares." While they were running around Georgetown—to the U.S. embassy, the hotel where the relatives were staying—Sharon Amos slit the throats of her own children and then killed herself. Jim says he feels the most guilt over these deaths—that in their panicked search for information, they lost sight of a person "we knew was a real fanatic."

The next day, they heard that some 400 people had died. At that point, they just hoped the rest had fled into the bush. Jim thought of Yvette, of his mother, his brother, his sister Agnes, all the others—especially of Yvette. "You can't describe the thought of knowing you lost somebody. Then I also thought that maybe she wasn't dead. So you hold on to hope when you know hope's not there." It took them five days to find out that 914 people were gone.

How does a person recover from such epic tragedy? How do you carry on when the man responsible for it—the man you believe saved your life not once but twice, whose vision of a promised land you embraced without question—is the man who gave you a home and his name?

When he came back to San Francisco, in December, Jimmy attended as many funerals of Jonestown victims as he could. It was a small gesture of atonement, and a way of grieving without grieving for himself. "How could I grieve for myself? It was my father who caused all this."

Most of the families welcomed him, but at the reception after one funeral, a woman came out of her bedroom and put a gun to his head. Why should he live when her daughter was dead? Jimmy looked up at her and said, "Take me out of my misery." In Georgetown, Jimmy and his brothers had promised one another to stay alive, and in those first few months, he says, "when it would have been easier just to give up, easier not to carry this legacy on," that was the only thing that kept him from suicide himself.

Beyond enduring the torment of unimaginable loss, Jimmy felt he was becoming "lepertized" by an uncomprehending world, just as his father had predicted: the police watching his apartment; being paraded with other survivors in federal court. He narrowed his focus to simply rebuilding his life. He began by working for tips at Presbyterian Hospital (now California Pacific), on Buchanan Street; at night, he drove a bank courier car back and forth to Oakland. And he began calling himself James Jones: "I had so much hostility and hatred for my father, I wouldn't even claim his name."

He and Yvette had planned to attend medical school in Cuba, and Jimmy saw now that it was mostly because Yvette had wanted to go. Still, he wanted to help people; he must have found the idea of saving lives appealing, too. For two years, he worked as a night-shift orderly at Laguna Honda Hospital. Then he cut back his hours to go to respiratory-therapy school during the day. Later, he worked in the cardiac intensive-care unit at Seton and at Kaiser in San Francisco, where he eventually became assistant manager of cardiopulmonary services.

Even in those first years home, Jim attracted people with his friendliness. Looking for another "soul mate," he'd had three fiancées by the time he was 24. One was a former Temple member who hadn't gone to Jonestown; another, someone he'd known in high school; the third was the sister of Johnny Cobb's girlfriend. With them, he didn't need to share his history, and "I never let them see me sweat. I didn't cry and agonize a lot," he says. "I'm not a touchy-feely guy. My father said people's lives are based 60 percent on emotion, and I wanted to be unique, or at least try to be. If that's what everybody's like—I'm not like everybody else." The emotional connections were shallow, and all three engagements were broken.

Then he met Erin Fowler, a warm, capable blonde who worked in Kaiser's intensive-care unit for newborns. As a teenager in Redding, she had helped raise her four younger siblings, two of them adopted, after her father's death when she was 12. Sensing Erin's strength and compassion, and because it was his mother's birthday, Jim told her his story on their first date, in early 1984. He thinks she was the first woman to hear it, as they sat in his car at Ocean Beach. Erin thought everyone at Jonestown had died, and when she realized he was telling the truth, she thought, "Great, he's in a cult." Frightened and confused, she jumped out of the car and took off down the beach. Jim caught up with her and said, "I didn't mean to scare you. I didn't want you to hear it from anyone else." After Erin got back in the car, they talked some more and then went for a late dinner. They married in July 1987.

"He seemed so together and personable for someone who'd been through what he'd been through," Erin says. "That's what swept me off my feet. A lot of people with a burden like that would walk around with ten tons on their back. I don't think I realized what I was taking on at the time, but it kind of came out gradually."

Stephan and Tim were also living in the Bay Area, and Jim was close to a few others left from his past. When Jim and Erin married, at Star of the Sea Catholic Church in San Francisco, Yvette's mother and stepfather, Vivian Muldrow Davis and Robert Davis, sat in the pew where his parents would have been. "Robert showed me what a husband was, how you should be responsible to your family," says Jim. In his quest for normality, that was important, and the Davises' deep spiritual beliefs helped him find solace in faith. But Jim's life got busier when he became a father, and slowly the bonds with Yvette's family frayed. He and Erin now have three sons—Robert, now fourteen; Ryan, twelve; and Ross, nine—whom they are raising Catholic. Jim isn't devout, but he likes the Catholic notion of asking for forgiveness and direction and moving on.

In the early nineties, he became director of the respiratory-therapy department at San Mateo County General Hospital. Then living in Pinole, across the bay, he and Erin split the distance between jobs and moved to Pacifica, where they live in a 1970s tract home in a quiet neighborhood of winding streets named for national parks: Everglades, Glacier, Grand Teton. A man set on living a rather unexceptional life could do worse.

As with most working couples with children, their lives were busy and full, and for a few more years, Jim had little trouble concentrating on the present. "Every once in a while, he would have a memory or see somebody who would strike something, and he would tell me about it," says Erin, "but it didn't upset him to the core." Then, in 1993, David Koresh's Branch Davidians had their standoff with federal authorities at the Ranch Apocalypse, at Waco, Texas, and feelings long submerged began to stir in Jim. Here were other children being set adrift in a country that could comprehend neither them nor their loss.

People who knew him noticed the parallels with Jonestown and worried about him. Jim kept telling friends at the hospital he was fine ("Yeah, I'm OK; why?"), but at home he started to drink, and this time he wouldn't tell Erin what was bothering him. He wasn't conscious of it himself. What got to him was when Robert, then three, heard Jonestown mentioned on the television. "There's a place that's named after us!" he told his parents. "We should go there."

After the Waco siege ended in flames in mid-April, Lawrence Wright sought out Jim, Tim, and Stephan and began writing a long article for the November 22, 1993, issue of the New Yorker—15 years after the Jonestown deaths. Stephan and Jim thought that describing the honest, passionate commitment of the people they'd known might help the world understand the 21 children from Waco. Unlike his brothers, Tim never talked about Jonestown. There, he had lost not only his Jones family but his birth mother, four siblings, his wife and daughter, and 15 other relatives. He had also endured, with Johnny Cobb, the horror of helping Guyanese authorities try to identify the dead. He had remarried, become a father, and built a successful furniture business, but his brothers felt he had never been the same. Even so, they thought he was tough enough to do the interviews, and they persuaded him to meet with Wright.

Wright found that the brothers had responded in diverse ways to their loss. The Rainbow Family's only birth son, Stephan had been consumed with guilt and anguish. He felt he should have tried, somehow, to avert the calamity in Jonestown. He had tried to find an escape in drugs, but at least he'd given vent to his emotions. The door to feeling that Tim had erected shattered once he opened it a crack with Wright. He wanted to discuss Jonestown just this once, with his wife present, and in a public place. "Ten minutes later he was crying and yelling," Wright told me. "I felt terribly honored to be given the gift of his story, but it was so...it was overwhelming. I've never really gotten over it as a reporter. I tapped into a deep well of unbearable emotion."

"Jim is the steady one," Wright wrote in the New Yorker, "the one who knows what he wants." He mentioned his friendliness and charm and his "rather unnerving dispassion." What was unnerving for Jim, though, was seeing the article in print. For years, he'd buried any negative memories or unendurable thoughts—anything that would slow him down or cause him pain as he moved forward—in a kind of mental trunk. Now the trunk was open, but he refused to look inside. Whenever he started to feel something, he poured himself a drink.

When Erin had met Jim, she was impressed by his close relationships with Stephan and Tim. "When we were 18, we were inseparable for support," Jim explains. "Nobody could fall. If someone started getting weak, they had someone to lean on." The article, however, caused a rift; all three came away with hard feelings. "All our perspectives contradicted each other," he says. Perhaps, too, Jim's lack of overt sorrow offended his brothers.

They must have needed time to heal reopened wounds, and for Jim, that took several trying years. He and Erin bought their home during that time, and after trying to adopt a biracial girl, they had their third son, Ross. But Jim's best friend in those days was a cocktail. "I became more erratic," he commented one day, sitting with Erin. "Very short-tempered. I lost focus. I've historically been a driven person; that was five years of moving nowhere."

The brothers had been tight for so long, and then, Erin says, "It was like, ‘There goes what's left of my family. I don't have a family; I don't know who my birth mother is; everybody I knew growing up is dead.'"

"‘Jim, we're your family,'" she tried to remind him. "‘You may not have those things, but you have us, and we're here. Let's try to move forward.' But you can only talk so much to someone who's lost in alcohol," she says. "My father died of complications from alcoholism. The denial and all that is real present. Until you're ready to get it off your back, you can talk all night and it's not gonna work."

Jim began to face his drinking only after another crisis, and the media was instrumental in this one, too. In 1998, on the 20th anniversary of the Jonestown deaths, Stephan and Jim returned to Guyana with a crew from ABC-TV's 20/20. It is heart-wrenching to watch Stephan on the videotape. Talking with Forrest Sawyer, he cries while remembering all those whose lives ended there. "I loved those people," he says, his voice breaking. "Some of the sweetest and most courageous people I've ever known lived in Jonestown, and I wish to God"—he can hardly get the words out—"that I had a chance...to do it again."

He sobs when he sees the land, now overgrown with tall grass and bushes, without a trace of what they'd built there. And yet Stephan, who had loved the jungle, spent his last night in Guyana sleeping out in the bush alone, and he seemed to find a measure of peace facing Jonestown again. Jim's feelings, suppressed all this time, were creeping up on him. He put off applying for a passport so long, it took someone from the State Department to get him one at the last minute, and he arrived on Stephan's last day.

On the video, the contrast between Stephan's pain and Jim's dispassion is striking when Jim, who took Erin and his sons with him, walks on the land where Jonestown had been. Asked how he feels, he replies, "I feel kind of happy." In another scene, the voice-over comments, "Jim knew just what he wanted to do" here: to locate something tangible from those still-unreal events. He knows from photographs where to find the vat that had held the poison, and we see him digging it up. "Sad but true," he tells Sawyer. "That vat is the only thing that really makes it Jonestown."

Later, he tells Sawyer he doesn't think he has had a full night's sleep since returning from Jonestown, "because of dreams, feelings, emotions that are just coming out—it's Niagara Falls with these emotions."

Once he came home from Guyana, Jim realized he was tired of "anesthetizing" himself. After 20 years of dealing with his trauma in his own way, he went into group therapy for six months. "I wanted to evaluate if I had an addiction problem," he says. "And I didn't; I had a problem with wanting to remember the past."

Going back to Guyana had shown him that positive thoughts and cocktails would not help in grappling with the questions that he had finally begun asking himself. But the trip hadn't offered any answers. Finally, he realized—he calls it an epiphany—that there were no answers.

"I can't find out the reason Jonestown happened," he says. "Do you know why Jonestown happened? I stopped asking myself why. Why did my father do this? Why was I adopted? Why was I given his name? Why did people die? Why is my life—Why? Why? Why?"

Then he pauses. "Hel-lo?" he says with his deep, rumbly laugh. "There's no more whys." Instead, he decided, yes, to look at the positives. "I had a wonderful experience in my childhood. I was given a great education. I felt loved. I felt special. I was given opportunities. Look what I can give back to my children, my community, my profession."

Some of this thinking came out of the group meetings, where, Jim says, he mostly listened. "I saw people destroying their lives by not embracing life. They think if they talk about it, they're doing something."

Hearing that, a therapist might respond that Jim has yet to confront his emotions. However, as Lawrence Wright, who has interviewed many trauma survivors, says, "his happiness and his ordinariness challenge our assumptions that it's better to explore your feelings about some awful event. I think some wounds are so profound, it really is better to leave them behind."

Jim had told Wright that when he concentrated on the good things about his father, he had fewer dreams about him. Once he decided to stop asking why, Jim forgave him. "Right or wrong, he did the best he could in raising me." He likes to say, "What doesn't kill me makes me stronger."

Jim Jones is particularly busy these days. A few years ago, he left the San Mateo hospital to work in pharmaceutical sales, in part to spend more time with his boys. Today he works for Guidant Corporation, in a division that serves cardiologists with patients who have suffered heart attacks and are at risk of having another; he's a heart-failure-therapy specialist. He coaches basketball at his younger sons' school, St. Stephen's, near Stonestown, and he works with young athletes at the Boys & Girls Club in the Fillmore district ("still scheduling basketball games"), where his boys play ball twice a week.

And lately, he's been spending time with a local filmmaker and being interviewed for a Laramie Project type of play in which actor Colman Domingo will speak his words. Oddly enough, now that all the torturous questions about Jonestown and being Jim Jones's son have proven unanswerable, he's comfortable discussing them.

Even acknowledging his father's madness, he says the adults at Jonestown must take some responsibility for being there, for allowing themselves to be manipulated. He sees now that he was articulate, creative, and favored enough to make the situation work for him as others suffered. Yet he knows that he, too, might have swallowed the poison. "When you're not involved in the flow of what was going on and the intensity of Jim Jones, you're able to challenge that thought. But if I were there, there would have been the commitment to my fellow person. And thinking maybe I didn't believe enough."

He has a different set of beliefs now, and they all end in the word responsibility. It's hard for Erin and some of his friends to avoid teasing him about his Republican views. "I look at it like this," he says, preparing to quote the old GOP bromide. "If a man's hungry, the Democrats say, ‘Here's a fish.' The Republicans say, ‘I'll teach you how to catch a fish.'" If they question him, he just laughs. It's like his Catholicism: "It works for me."

"I honestly believe that a higher power has a purpose for me being here. I don't know why God has me alive," he says, "but it's my responsibility to find out."

The popular mind conflates Jonestown with its apocalyptic end. Jim equates it with Peoples Temple and its shining dream of racial harmony and mutual care: "I still believe in what Jonestown was trying to do." And in his way, he's still crusading for social change—not by creating a new world in a faraway land, but by staying in the Bay Area with Erin, as an interracial couple raising their kids in a diverse environment. "You open yourself to other people," he says, "and you pray and you hope that we live an example that is infectious or that creates energy to change other people."

Living in the present once was a means of deflecting the past. Now, raising his own children, he finds something new is occurring. Here's one example. Jim, Stephan, Tim, Johnny Cobb—all the Peoples Temple basketball players, who survived Jonestown because they were playing ball—used to practice at Hamilton rec center, at Geary and Steiner. None of them had ever gone back. But Jim's boys play basketball there.

"So now I have my kids reliving this difficult experience in San Francisco. I'm having all these positive and good memories of these places now—replacing sad memories with happy ones." He is sitting with Erin when he says this, and he turns to her. "Maybe that's why we'll never leave this area, huh? It's just a part of me."

Back in 1998, Jim asked ABC to help him find his birth mother, and a few years ago, he went back to Indianapolis. Diane and his biological father, Larry, eventually married and had three other boys, one also named Larry Allen Knox.

"My mother was a manic depressive," Jim declares calmly. "ABC wanted to film our reunion, but she said she didn't feel worthy to meet me then." They corresponded, but they never met, and two years ago she died.

At her funeral, Jim met her other sons. "One is in and out of jail; one is a forklift driver, trying to do well, but...and the third is OK as long as he's on his medication. They live in agony every day." One of his uncles told him, "I'm so sorry you went through Jonestown. And I'm so happy Jim Jones adopted you."

Thursday, September 12, 2013

Joseph Szimhart ('sim-hart)


cult 101 from my perspective, but I hope it helps you.

some definitions

Cult. 1. A system of religious worship and ritual. 2. A religion or sect considered extremist or false. 3.a. Obsessive devotion to a person or principle; b. The object of such devotion. (The American Heritage Dictionary, 1994)
this site concentrates on the second and third definitions, we will not ignore the primary one as they all work to define one social activity. For more about cult and its meaning, see the section under Religion.

Brainwashing. Intensive, forcible indoctrination aimed at replacing a person's basic convictions with an alternative set of fixed beliefs. (The American Heritage Dictionary
This history of how we acquired this term brainwashing is study in itself. Briefly, writer Edward Hunter coined "brainwashing" in 1951 in an article about American prisoners of war who were forcibly indoctrinated by North Koreans. He derived it from the Chinese hsi nao, literally "wash brain" but properly translated as "thought reform." Thought reform for the larger, sacred cause of the group agenda was (is) a good thing in Communist China. And it was not always forcible or intense. As follow-up on the Korean prisoners of war showed, forcible "brainwashing" is not as effective as thought reform through systematic indoctrination based on rapport and psychological manipulation rather than physical force. The goal in both approaches is to "recruit" and take control of a person. Once the "gun" was removed from the heads of the brainwashed POW nearly all reverted to their previous personality and beliefs.

Thought Reform.& Not in my dictionaries. Robert J. Lifton defined this concept in his now classic study published in 1961, Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism in which he described eight themes for it to be effective. His work was based partly on interviews he conducted with Chinese affected by communism. Margaret T. Singer, Ph.D., who recently passed away, defined six conditions for thought reform in her book Cults in Our Midst (1995). For a summary of both versions go to: http://hometown.aol.com/carol2180/treform.htm Both of these authors observed that a charismatic leader with immoderate ideals is most effective in maintaining devotion through a high demand system. Steve Hassan , a student of both authors and mind control proposed in his book Releasing the Bonds& a 4 part model for a thought reform environment: Behavior, Information, Thought and Emotional controls. As John Marks concludes in his penetrating book The Search for the Manchurian Candidate: The CIA and Mind Control, brainwashing works most effectively when it mimics religious conversion, something that cannot be forced through imprisonment, drugs or physical torture.

Thought control 1. The practice by a totalitarian government as attempting (as by propaganda) to prevent subversive and other undesirable ideas from being received and competing in the minds of the people with the official ideology and policies. 2. The use of a group or institution of authoritarian techniques similar in nature and purpose to governmental thought control. (Webster's Third International Dictionary)

Mind Control. Also not in my dictionaries. However it is a popular expression that swings several ways: 1. I control of my own thoughts. 2. Someone or something is invading or controlling my thought processes. 3. Group influence determines how I control my thoughts. 4. I conform my thought to beliefs defined by a group or a guru.

The following helps put what we have covered so far into context:
Socially problematic cultic characteristics include combined behaviors such as:

1. Compliance with a group
2. Dependence on a leader
3. Avoiding dissent
4. Devaluing outsiders

(for more on these characteristics, see The Wrong Way Home by Arthur J. Deikman, 1990: Beacon Press). The more extreme these behaviors, the more potential for abuse in any group activity or relationship.
In general Cult activity refers to any devotional or ritualistic attention to a person, doctrine or object. Most religions have cult activity, or a cult, that is central to devotional activity.

Cult in perspective: Christianity in its various forms has the cult of devotion to Jesus Christ. (btw, I'm a practicing Catholic). Catholics have the cult of the Eucharist during which they receive the "body and blood" of Jesus. In ancient Judaism they had the cult of the Ark of the Covenant. Some Asian religions have the cult of ancestor worship. Vampires of legend practice the cult of drinking blood. Northwest Native Americans have the cult of totem animals. I have many books with cult in the title that do not focus on destructive groups, for example, The Japanese Cult of Tranquility by Karlfried Durckheim (1991), The Plato Cult by David Stove (1991), and Cult of the Cat by Patricia Dale-Green (1980). Labeling something a cult tells us little or nothing about the morality or ethics of the person or group that supports such cult activity. You must answer the question: What kind of cult are you talking about and what do they do?

If cult participants follow the four patterns suggested by Deikman above, they become vulnerable to thought reform and mind control.

Thought reform (see What is Thought Reform) occurs when the psychological environment of someone is manipulated to engineer and sustain a change in personality, goals, and attitudes that conform with a group agenda. Mind control occurs when the participant in a thought reform environment has internalized the suggestions and adopted the behaviors to the point where the recruit "polices" his or her thoughts and actions according to stated agendas. If there are hidden agendas the deception can undermine a group member's ability to question or criticize. If the group member is privy to the hidden agenda, the "secret" controls their loyalty and ability to communicate with outsiders who do not deserve to know secrets because they have not yet been initiated.

Sometimes these secrets are so guarded that rejection of them or revealing them to undeserving hordes or undeserving persons is punishable. 2500 years ago the cult of Pythagoras is an example of the initiate sect that punished "traitors" with threat of death. Modern Mormonism, Scientology and Masonic movements have similar, guarded secrets. They would argue that it their right to keep secrets as they are "sacred." Many gangs that operate like cults institute such vows, and we can also find evidence in the history of the Mafia or Casa Nostra. Punishment can be overt as in harassment, lawsuit, assault or even homicide. It can also come in less tangible forms like the suggestion (phobia indoctrination) of returning karma, of hell, of mental and physical illness, of demon possession, of accident and other "deserved" misfortune.

In summary, the more intense or closed the influence/thought reform/brainwashing the more likely a person will suffer psychological closure, thus making of them a more effective or deployable agent of the group agenda. Exiting the cult thereafter has powerful implications as one's new identity, life investment and group relationships are a high price to pay for rejecting the group. Walking away ain't so easy.

Next we can learn from different disciplines.
Sociology and cult

Most basic courses in sociology offer only a brief mention of the cult problem. For example, in one "quick study" outline I have it states under Religion/Varieties: 3. Sects and Cults, a. Contrary to dominant society, b. Little formal training of leadership, often based on charismatic qualities of person, c. Members enter sect through adult conversions. Typically a course might spend one class or part of a class on cults and sects. Sociology does not use a medical approach, therefore it is not in the business of diagnosis and treatment. This does not mean that sociology ignores the harm some cults inflict, but it does tend to argue for the rights of minorities and marginal religion putting it at odds with anti-cult crusaders who seek to remedy harm. Nor is sociology bereft of information. On the contrary the controversial behaviors associated with closed cult systems are studied throughout sociology if by other names.

Consider these dozen papers among 46 included in Down to Earth Sociology, Eight Edition edited by James M. Henslin, 1995:          Life among violent people: "Doing Fieldwork Among the Yanomano"/ Napoleon A. Chagnon. Subtle conformance to internalized culture : "The Sounds of Silence" / Edward T. Hall, Mildred R. Hall. The power of groups: "If Hitler Asked You to Electrocute a Stranger, Would You? Probably" / Philip Meyer (this is about the important Stanley Milgram experiments that demonstrate that you and I could easily have been obedient Nazis). Building a nourishing social structure: "Communal Life-Styles for the Elderly" / Arlie Hochschild. And under a section titled DEVIANCE AND SOCIAL CONTROL, Keeping people in their place: "Eating Christmas in the Kalahari" / Richard Borshay Lee. Effects of labels: "The Saints and the Roughnecks" / William Chambliss. The deviance of social control: "The Pathology of Imprisonment" / Philip G. Zimbardo (who is well known for his excellent contributions to understanding cult behaviors). Wealth and Power : "The Bohemian Grove and Other Retreats" / G. William Domhoff. The final solution : "Genocide in Cambodia" / Eric Markusen. When cultures collide : "The Amazon's Savvy Indians" / Marlise Simons. Managing social change: "Social Change Among the Amish" / Jerry Savells. Struggling for identity: "Searching for Roots in a Changing World" / Richard Rodriguez.

Nowhere in Henslin's book is "cult" mentioned, yet the text is rich with information about varieties of group behavior, influence and its effect on persons. To understand cult behavior one can and should seek outside  books specifically about cults without ignoring the latter. In other words, do not merely rely on a Google search under "cult."

Debate over brainwashing as a legitimate social engineering phenomenon .

Best illustrated in Misunderstanding Cults edited by Benjamin Zablocki, Ph.D. (2001). For Zablocki's website go here . Read especially "brainwashing controversy" and  Methodological Fallacies in Anthony's Critique of Exit Cost Analysis re Dick Anthony, Ph.D. 


Religion and cult

Ah, here's the rub! Nowhere is cult more confused or stereotyped than when we associate it only with religious beliefs or mental health (see Psychiatry below). Consider the following five stereotypes: 1. A cult is anyone else's religion. 2. Anyone who believes differently than me is brainwashed. 3. Cult members practice witchcraft and Satanism, cast spells and work magic through demons. 4. Cult members must be crazy. 5. All religions are cults.

Here we will consider stereotype 1.A cult is anyone else's religion.

Stereotypes form when words or images convey simplistic conceptions or opinions. Words have a way of migrating into new meaning territory over time, from neutral and descriptive to pejorative and ugly, to parody or stereotype and to descriptive of something new or a neologism. Gay is an obvious example. Bad, cool, hip, the bomb, have all taken turns to mean appreciated, beautiful or I approve.

Symbols migrate in meaning also. What do you think when you see this?

For thousands of years in the Indian (Hindu) and Tibetan cultures it meant and still means good luck and prosperity . The symbol appears worldwide as decoration on ancient structures from Greece to China to Central America. It has many meanings, all positive and dynamic. Less than a century ago the Nazis appropriated it for its same dynamic attributes, but they also radicalized the swastika into an evil symbol in the eyes of the world, especially among Jews.

Cult has gone through a similar change. I have a Webster's Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary that I received in 1970, a mere 33 years ago. Compare this definition with the 1994 Heritage one above: cult [1970]: 1. formal religious veneration: worship. 2. a system of religious beliefs and ritual; also, its body of adherents. 3. a system for the cure of disease based on dogma set forth by its promulgator. 4. great and faddish devotion; also, its object or adherents. In the press journalists still use the term in several, appropriate ways: A celebrity has a cult following, a movie has reached cult status, the perpetrator appears to belong to a religious cult, or the Catholic Church approves the cult (veneration) of a new saint. Some scholars of religion who concentrate on the new religious movements came to hate the label.  By the early 1970s influential Evangelical Christians and some anti-cultists began to use the term liberally as a pejorative, alleging that a cult or deviant sect was either satanically influenced or utilized brainwashing techniques or both.

Specifically, The Kingdom of the Cults by Walter Martin greatly impacted Christian thinking about new and different religious groups when it was first published in 1965 (many new editions to 2003). His standard for cult was a religious one that measured other religions by their adherence to his peculiar interpretation of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. I say peculiar not because I think him way off-base in his apologetics, but because his standard works only for Evangelicals or Fundamentalists. These Christians feel threatened by the cults on a spiritual warfare basis and believe demons operate in their milieu. Many believe that the rise in cults heralds the end-times when Satan has his way with us. In any case, Martin's book catapulted cult into "c" word status. Critics of the new movements adopted the term. Labeling a group as a cult was tantamount to saying "they are evil."

Even more than Evangelicals, Jews were the other religious or cultural group to react heavily to the modern cult phenomena. By the early to mid 1970s Jewish groups set up cult clinics to help counsel families of or reeducate the comparatively high number of young Jews recruited into Bible-based and Eastern guru-based movements as well as controversial mass therapy groups. Their dedicated research and work continues to be fundamentally instrumental in educating not only their own people but in influencing sectarian and non-sectarian groups about the cult problem. Cult as a spurious or abusive devotional system now dominates public religious discourse obscuring the more appropriate academic use of the term.

Of course, the entire cult awareness movement including Evangelicals, Jews and secular organizations like the American Family Foundation all have matured over time and made adjustments and improvements without losing their original intent. Nevertheless, as the AFF website admits, we seem to be stuck with cult to define deviant, abusive or destructive groups that manipulate devotees. Much the same we are stuck with the deprogramming and brainwashing labels to the chagrin of nearly everyone in the field.
In sum, the religious approach to this area is more concerned with beliefs and doctrines than they are about deviant behaviors.

Psychiatry, mental illness and cult

Stereotype 2. Anyone who thinks differently than me is brainwashed . 

The absurdity of the 2 statement  should be obvious. I've been employed by an emergency psychiatric hospital (currently as a crisis intake caseworker) since 1998. Patients, especially those with acute symptoms of schizophrenia or mania have stated some version of #2 to me, but it usually comes out, "I'm not mentally ill, you are (or "the doctor is")" or, "All you are going to do is drug me and brainwash me with the way you want me to be." Cult members I've interviewed or exit counseled have their own versions: "How do you know you're not brainwashed by science, your schools, your government, your family or your religion? Yes, I'm brainwashed--I'm cleansed of all the lies I used to believe. I have a right to believe and think what I want. You have your way of looking at things and I have mine---both are true because everyone has their own truth."

Psychiatry is interested in maintaining mental health and in diagnosing and treating illness that adversely affects behavior and thought processes. Cult activity affects behavior and thought processes, and it often claims to improve spiritual as well as mental health. However, it presents increasingly adverse to outsiders when cult activity utilizes thought reform and authoritarianism, and when the probability of harm to insiders increases when authoritarianism reigns. So how can we tell the difference between unusual beliefs and delusions? Between unethical behavior and dharma, devotion or patriotism? I can tell you there is a difference, but it is not immediately apparent in all cases. Read on.

stereotype 3Cult members practice witchcraft and Satanism, cast spells and work magic through demons.

It is not unusual for cult experts to receive inquiries either from or about mentally ill people that confuse mind control, cult activity and even demon possession with an active mental illness. In my case, most of these odd inquiries are from or about people with paranoia, delusions, or hallucinations. I have worked with students or devotees of Satanism--demons and occult energy were never the core issue with them as the abuse they experienced was very real, not metaphysical. Some told stories of being deceived, illicit drug abuse, petty theft, and sexual assault. Most complained of narcissistic leaders and manipulation-- fairly typical stuff for ex-cult members. The intrusive metaphysical stuff and demons often disappear once the ex-member grasps and dispenses with the effects of phobia, magical thinking, suggestion, autosuggestion (hypnosis) and extraordinary stage magic. In other words, they lose naiveté through education.

There is quite a difference working with the mentally ill and the average cult member in exit counseling. Mentally ill people do not reality test very well when assessing information that sheds light on their group, doctrines or leader's history. A delusional person may pathologically  hold onto conspiracy theories, false beliefs and use thought stopping or blocking ideation to resist discursive dialogue. A common phobia among these types is that some agency secretly imbedded a "mind control chip" into their skull or another body part. In one case, I talked a mentally ill  man I knew well [15 year earlier he was my roommate in college] out of using a steak knife to dig the "government chip" out of his forehead--he already had a nasty laceration from a butter knife he used the day before. Schizophrenic types can invent elaborate schemes that can seem intelligently contrived--I have pages and pages of email from one such young man who thought a cult in the government was trying to control and kill him. Nothing I could say to encourage him to get help worked, so I eventually gave up. They are not merely stubborn.

The key to understanding this confusion psychiatry calls reality testing. To quote from one of the very best layman's guides to the Diagnostic Systems Manual-IV, Your Mental Health by doctors Allen Frances and Michael First (1998): "A fundamental aspect of normal mental functioning is the ability to distinguish between thoughts and perceptions that originate within our minds versus the stimuli that come from the outside world. This ongoing process is called "reality testing." Most of us maintain a fairly strong grasp on reality, except when we dream at night or if we take a psychedelic drug. In contrast, someone suffering from psychosis has lost the ability to distinguish fact from fantasy, reality from imagination, and internal fears from actual threats" (303). In common jargon we say the person must be mad, crazy, out of their mind or psycho.

Stereotype 4. Cult members must be crazy.

Cult members almost never are crazy, nor have they broken with reality in a pathological way. Cults led by grandiose, paranoid or narcissistic leaders tend to abandon, reject or dismiss mentally ill cult members. I've been to many mental hospitals over the years to try to exit counsel rejected cult members who continue to believe and infuse the cult jargon into other disordered thoughts. The successful cult member is one who can live in an intense world of overvalued, even bizarre rituals and ideas (my leader communicates with the dead, angels or flying saucer masters, and he can levitate and I will too someday), yet reality test fairly well in careers, chores and day to day affairs. Unsuccessful cult members either leave on their own (most do) because they either cannot live with the high demands (give me all your money and reject your family and their values), or they research and methodically apply doubt to (reality test) the doctrine, the leader's history, and the group's effectiveness. The rejected are either too intense or disobedient for the fringe sect to tolerate. Remember, most cults hold a high if misguided or bizarre standard of behavior and thought, often resulting in a closed system with "black and white" dominating their palettes. Destructive cult leaders tend to blame the victim-- they say members get crazy when they refuse to obey the doctrine or they practice the rituals improperly.

Cult leaders often have what psychiatry calls Axis II disorders or personality disorders with anti-social personality and narcissism on top of the list, in my view (I refer to the group therapy work of W. R. Bion). Common to these leaders are mood disorders or swings, but they rarely reach pathological criteria so they are not ill in a clinical sense (Axis I disorders). In a word they are charismatic types whether they present as extroverts with hypo manic features or introverts with schizoid (withdrawn or paranoid) features. They tend to either be strong managers or have influence over authoritarian managers who run the group and protect, even help isolate the leader (In the relatively small Emin group, most members or cells have never met the leader).

Psychiatry has basically ignored the cult phenomenon as it falls under other academic disciplines, primarily Social Psychology. This is not to say that some psychiatrists have not had valuable things to say. Louis Jolyn West, M.D. comes to mind immediately. He was a fascinating, brilliant man who I got to know personally, one who the Scientology group regarded as a most evil force--that group hates psychiatry with a passion.   
Skeptics and cult  

Stereotype 5. All religions are cults 

Although cynical atheists might make such a commentthe careful skeptic will find the statement ludicrous. Equally ludicrous is to say all cults are religions. Cultists who direct devotional activity toward politicians, entertainers, a sport, a totem animal, a scientific principle, a rock or an idea do not regard the object of their devotion as the universal Source or high God. As we stated above, most religions include a cult activity if not many, but that does not define them as only a cult. Most established religions are organizations that include a variety of social dynamics: democratic elections, schools that also teach secular subjects that comply with cultural standards, accommodations for the handicapped, etc. In other words, these established groups may be parochial, but their participation in the cultural milieu is not all that eccentric, elitist or abusive.

Skeptical societies and research by scientists regarding paranormal claims and events are valuable resources for exit counselors who deconstruct cult activity for their clients. Cult leaders commonly make outlandish claims or appear to have paranormal powers like telepathy, bi-location, spirit contact, mental healing, teleportation, and so on. Saddam Hussein, the deposed Iraqi dictator, reportedly has a magical stone imbedded in his shoulder, and his devotees believe this keeps him from getting killed. This ridiculous amulet has a powerful grip on believers' behavior.

True skepticism is an equal opportunity reaper, thus all religions with miraculous claims are under that microscope. Sophisticated religions, like the Catholic Church, no longer ignore or suppress science but work with it. This does not mean that the Church is always happy with what science delivers or exposes. It is important in our age to distinguish the aesthetics of religion from scientifically plausible reality. Catholics agree that there is no evidence to test that a wafer of bread changes into the body and blood of Christ during a mass. It is an article of faith.

Cults often refuse to acknowledge good science. Without providing evidence today's Raelian movement out of Canada has publicly claimed to have cloned human beings, for example. No independent science reviewer has ever seen these babies let alone examined the evidence. On the negative claim side, some groups assert that all the moon landings were hoaxes contrived by the governments as landing on the moon is impossible.
For a book list and more basic information, go to:

www.csicop.org
www.skeptic.com
http://www.csj.org
 ______________________________________________________________________________

Exit Counseling, as non-coercive intervention

definition controversy:

Intervention with a member of an abusive cult or relationship appears in many forms and approaches, especially with the recent rise in cultic movements since 1965. This is a relatively new field in social psychology and therapeutic education with no formal training or license available yet. Complicating the issue is definition: Diagnosis comes before remedy and little has been established in psychiatry or social psychology formally to address the problem--and this apparently is a worldwide neglect. Why? I attempt to answer in cult101 . So definition is unfortunately relative to the perception and intent of the intervener, but I will nevertheless offer my perceptions based on over 25 years of experience and study in this arena.

In this site we will call intervention with a person in an abusive cult or relationship exit counseling because we would not attempt intervention if we did not expect them to exit the activity You may be familiar with the more popular label, deprogramming . Less likely you will have heard of thought reform consultation , a late expression for a model designed in the mid 1990s by a group of exit counselors who created an ethical code or standard for the cult intervention profession. The standard upholds the right of the client (cult member) to leave the intervention at any time, to be treated with dignity, and it eschews physical coercion and verbal abuse. Go to Ethical Standards for more information. Strategic Interaction Approach is another non-coercive if idiosyncratic intervention model developed by a leading exit counselor, one you can access at www.freedomofmind.com . 

One old deprogramming approach sometimes included coercive tactics like kidnapping and false imprisonment. You can go to my essays about deprogramming stereotypes in media to learn more about how and why the coercive intervention model is etched in the public mind (Cynical hint: It sells movies, television shows and magazines). This model assumed that anyone in a cult was somehow brainwashed or put through a thought reform program. It assumed that the cult member walked around in trance, as if hypnotized. And it assumed that only radical remedies would work to "snap" a person out of this trance to augment the goal of the intervention. The goal was to educate about mind control, influence techniques, false religion and the true history of the cult and its leader. The assumptions may have been crude as sometimes were the intervention methods, but the brainwashing/deprogramming model was not completely wrong. In any case, due to personal ethics and the threat of criminal charges, interventionists turned to and refined existing non-coercive approaches.

why me?

In my case, I began in 1980 to help people with cult problems on an informal basis and inadvertently many of them broke ranks with their group as a result. From 1986 through 1991 I entered the world of exit counselors and deprogrammers. My career during that time included both coercive and non-coercive cases. Since 1991 I work only according to the standards mentioned above. In 1998 I resolved to work as an exit counselor on a part time basis only. I mention this because there is little in the way of cult interventions that I have not experienced or studied. I stopped counting in the mid 1990s after I had encountered around 300 individuals to discuss their cult involvement at the request of some concerned party, intervention team or family member This does not include countless persons I've advised and interviewed in person, by phone and through email.     

When?

Interventions occur after a concerned party has determined that:
  • Someone they love is involved in a deceptive, manipulative or otherwise abusive relationship.
  • This relationship has certain characteristics of a closed system or "cult" activity.
  • The person they love would want to be away from the controversial influence if they had new information about the group, the leader/manager, and the influence techniques that might be undermining his or her critical awareness.
  • An expert with exit counseling experience is available.

The TRC helps the client understand hidden agendas of the leader or group as well as how the group manipulates intelligence, emotions, behaviors, and information (see Hassan, 1988). The TRC does this, not by attacking the group in question, but by explaining how abusive thought reform systems operate, and by giving examples of groups that use these abusive techniques. The TRC also helps the client to dispell phobias induced during group participation. Often these phobias (irrational fear of occult powers, demons, sickness, accident, insanity, or other personal, social, or environmental catastrophe) linger even though the member has broken with the group in question. Real threats of harm can be countered by real actions like police protection, personal vigilance, or prosecution.




Exit Counseling: A Practioner's View, by Joe Szimhart

What has come to be called "exit counseling" grew out of formalized attempts to talk someone out of their devotion to a controversial group, ritual, person or lifestyle. While interventions are not new (e.g., both St.Thomas Aquinas and St. Francis of Assisi met with parental intervention to stop them from their religious paths) the relative explosion of new religious movements, experimental mass therapies, and cult activity since the 1960s has been met with new social resistance. People who knew and loved someone under the influence of such groups noted disturbing personality changes, as if the person were under a spell or "programmed." They noted that the person had been wrongly informed and manipulated to change personality or to conform to a group will.

Attempts to reverse cultic influence came to be known as "deprogramming" by the mid 1970s. At first, interventions were non-coercive, meaning that cultists were not held against their will. As this approach often failed, many families opted to abduct or place the cultist "under house arrest" to get them to listen to ex-members and unlicensed specialists who came to be known as deprogrammers. Deprogramming often worked very well, but when it did not expensive legal reprisals could ensue. Cultists sometimes reported abusive treatment by deprogrammers. These stories were (and are) naturally exaggerated by cult managers to better control members who might visit their families and meet a deprogrammer (see Propaganda ). In any case, many deprogrammers would not tolerate coercion during interventions and they wanted to reduce the trauma of intervention to both the family and deprogramee.

To distinguish the non-coercive approaches, some specialists adopted the label of "exit counselor" by the mid 1980s. This approach emphasizes education and dialogue about the true history and nature of the group and compares it with similar groups. It also addresses the nature of thought reform, mind control, and influence techniques like hypnosis. Some exit counselors incorporate family therapy into their sessions. Some do not consider their profession to be counseling and call themselves "thought reform consultants" or "cult information specialists." I prefer the latter designation and I see myself more as an educator and communicator.

Most of the exit counselors I know were "cult" members at one time. Some of them specialize in exiting members from the group they left. Others, like myself ( I had been a member of the Church Universal and Triumphant from 1979-80) have exited people from dozens of different groups.

When I work with an assistant, it is often an ex-member of the group in question but just as often it could be with another exit counselor. The team approach seems to work best in most cases. The intervention team usually includes two to four concerned family members and two exit counselors. There are no hard rules as to numbers but one on one sessions are unusual because at least one concerned party must be present to arrange for and introduce the exit counselor.

Successful interventions can last from several hours to more than a week, the norm being three to four days of "marathon" (6 to 14 hour) discussions. In exit counseling the length of each session is controlled by the "cultist." I do not relish long days of dialogue but when the person I am counseling wants to go on, I do. I have often seen the veil of deceit lift from a cultist who then "uncorks," like one awakened from a dream, and then pours out the questions one after the other for hours on end. When that happens it is not appropriate to say relax now, mate -- we can talk about it in the morning! If an intervention is successful, exit counselors may suggest follow-up therapists, ex-members to call, books to read, and rehab facilities if needed. The recovery period depends on the person. Research suggests that persons who have had appropriate exit counseling do far better, quicker than "walk-aways" who go it alone. See Snapping Flo Conway and Jim Siegelman (1995).

The downside of my field of cult specialists is that we are not licensed as such, nor are we regulated save by reputation. Some unscrupulous deprogrammers and specialists may have taken advantage of vulnerable families. Some may have taken on cases when they cannot handle the information adequately and resort to emotional attacks to try to "break" a cultist. Harsh tactics almost always backfire. The cultist can fake deconversion long enough to end an intervention, and then return to the group even months later. I have experienced this in past years. Since 1992 I no longer work with families who would coerce the cultist in any way although I had on occasion prior to 1992. I subscribe to Ethical Standards for Thought Reform Consultants that emphasize legality and respect (see "Ethics..." in Cultic Studies Journal , Vol. 13, No. 1, 1996). In any case, the choice to leave a group has to be reasonable and free to last and not solely emotional or religious. The choice needs to be grounded in a reality the cultist can begin to trust and use for the rest of his or her life no matter what spiritual path he or she chooses.

My advice to anyone seeking the services of an exit counselor is to interview several and check their reputations as thoroughly as you can. Interventions can be very expensive depending on whom you hire, but be wary of free helpers too. If someone you know is truly under a form of mind control, just having a session with a minister or therapist will rarely bear much fruit, unless, of course, they are trained in the dynamics of group influence and can handle the information about the group beliefs in depth. Experienced exit counselors cannot guarantee success in any case -- my impression is that 50 to 75% of their cases work out well. I have exited hundreds of people since the early 1980s and my success rate is in that range also. The keys to success are in the adequate preparation of the family and realistic projections.
Cultwatch Editorial Note: 

Joe Szimhart is a man of the highest ethics whose work is the antithesis of coercive persuasion and fanaticism. Joe has visited Australia, on a number of occasions, as an exit counsellor and is exceptionally well respected in his field. 

One Australian who left a group after a voluntary exit counselling [sic] with Joe has written: "An opportunity to change, like the one offered to me, does not come around very often; but deep down I knew it for the chance that it was. I held my breath and grasped the nettle. It stung like crazy, that tiger's tail, but I hung on - with just a little help from friends - and managed to reclaim my life. I'm just glad to be here, alive and well; and I hope that my experience will help somebody else, sometime. " [By a former member of Extra Terrestrial Earth Mission]


Propaganda If you explore the web for information about cult awareness groups, exit counselors or deprogrammers you will most likely find propaganda against them all. For example, typing my name (szimhart) into a search engine might bring you to the “CAN Reform Group”under http://www.scientology.org/can_reform/indict1.html . If that is your only exposure to me or anyone else it attempts to discredit, you may be sorely duped. You also may run across theFreedom Magazine published by Scientology to discredit its critics. For an open discussion of the controversy surrounding Scientology find alt.religion.scientology , or go to Marina's Manor: Scientology . Propaganda, like advertising, has a strange effect on people who absorb it uninformed: They tend to believe some of it if it “seems” credible. The spin doctors in our political machines use these same techniques to confuse and bend public opinion. They do it because it works, because most, even “skeptical” persons do not critically examine information that forms their opinions. Different people view controversial issues from differing perspectives. It pays to look at a few perspectives before coming to a position if not a conclusion about anything. CAN used to stand for a legitimate citizens advocacy group called the Cult Awareness Network. Since July of 1996 CAN was dissolved due to a successful Scientology supported lawsuit (the only successful one of 50 against CAN brought by the church that L. Ron Hubbard built). But Scientology managed to “purchase” the CAN logo and phone number (312 267-777) before the young man, Jason Scott, who Scientology “helped” to sue CAN and a deprogrammer, fired his Scientology lawyer, Ken Moxon. For more about the pseudoCAN event read The Washington Post December 1, 1996 “Anti-Cult Group Dismembered As Former Foes Buy Its Assets.” Also go to http:www.cnn.com/US/9612/19/scientology/index.html . The Jason Scott reversal is very interesting because he has hired a new law firm, one that has successfully sued Scientology in the past (see Phoenix New Times 12/24/96 “What’s $2.995 Million Between Former Enemies? Stunning settlement frees cult deprogrammer Rick Ross from almost all of $3 Million judgment). But, remember, if you call “CAN” now at the end of 1996, you probably get “Scientology.” Supporters of the old-CAN may be reorganizing under new names. ( CULTinfo had its first national conference in February, 1990 in Connecticut. It is also called: Leo J. Ryan Educational Foundation . PO Box 1180, Bridgeport, CT 06601. ph: 203-338-9776). For another opinion about my trial in Idaho over a failed deprogramming you can read about the case and my response at Professor Michael Nielsen's website: http://www.psychwww.com/psyrelig/szimhart.htm I was acquitted by a jury of all charges in 1993. To better understand how propaganda works check out Age of Propaganda by Pratkanis & Aronson, 1992 (W.H. Freeman) 

home 


Joseph P. Szimhart - Consultant

________________________________________________________________________________
Cult Information Articles by Joe Szimhart

jpsz@fast.net 

Essays:
Book Reviews:


Links

N.B.The following links are cult/sect information sites and resources--I may or may not endorse them, but please read my comments.
AFF  {Next conference at Orlando, FL on June 13-15, 2002]
American Family Foundation is a secular, not-for-profit, tax-exempt research center and educational organization founded in 1979.
AFF's mission is to study psychological manipulation and cultic groups, to educate the public and professionals, and to assist those who have been adversely affected by a cult experience. Publishes the Cultic Studies Journal .AFF's Comprehensive Links Page
Over 150 links to resources and groups.

Cult Hotline & Clinic -
120 West 57th St., New York, NY 10019 -
 (212) 632-4640
The Cult Hotline & Clinic is a program of the Jewish Board of Family and Children's Services, one of the nation's largest and most respected nonprofit mental health and social service agencies. JBFCS serves over 65,000 New Yorkers annually from all religious, ethnic, and economic backgrounds through a comprehensive range of 185 community-based programs, residential facilities, and day-treatment centers.
http://www.cultclinic.org/

Recovery and retreat center for cult and abuse victims:
a fully accredited, residential treatment center.
Wellspring - Paul Martin, PhD Director
P. O. Box 67, Albany, Ohio 45710
(740) 698-6277
http://wellspringretreat.org


Cult Information and exit counseling


Carol Giambalvo author of Exit Counseling: A Family Intervention, and co-author of The Boston Movement.

  Steve Hassan  < http://www.freedomofmind.com/ >
[author of Releasing the Bonds; Combatting Cult Mind Control]
General information about intervention and controversial group influence by one of the leading authorities on exit counseling and the "cult" problem..

Rick Ross  < http://www.rickross.com >  This website offers extensive information about many new religious movements and cults. Rick Ross is an experienced exit counselor  and lecturer. Good resource for research and news articles on groups.


From Esoteric Tradition to Pseudo-Science Today: Eric Wynants file 
scholars and articles that critique occultism, Theosophism and fringe science

Nova Religio-Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions
Religious Studies: good scholar site on many religions
The Roberts Parents Group: 
Website maintained by parents of members of Jim Roberts, aka Brother Evangelist, a small nomadic Christian sect, aka "the garbage eaters " or "Bretheren."  I have consulted as an exit counselor for this group since its inception.

Klanwatch 400 Washington Ave, Montgomery, AL 36104 (205)-264-0286. http://www.splcenter.org/
FACTNET: Good source for information online on controversial cult activity, cult experts, Scientology, etc.
http://www.factnet.org/
SIMPOS : Netherlands foundation on many sects: Adi Da, Brahma Kumaris, Aetherius, etc.

Re-FOCUS: Good resource for ex-members of destructive groups
http://www.refocus.org

Trancenet Page: critical of Transcendental Meditation, The Way International, Rama and many more groups.
Christian Resources:
Dialog Center , Denmark http://www.dci.dk
Spiritual Counterfeits Project , Berkeley, CA
Skeptical/Science:
Skeptic Magazine
Skeptic Magazine on Scientology
Skeptical Inquirer/CSICOP
Fringes of Reason (weird groups & skepticsim)
James Randi Home Page

Cult related literature

Suggested Reading

Captive Hearts, Captive Minds: Freedom and Recovery from Cults and Abusive Relationships by Madeleine Tobias and Janja Lalich (1994, Hunter House) 

"Crazy" Therapies: What Are They? Do They Work? by Margaret Thaler Singer and Janja Lalich (1996, Jossey-Bass) 

Cults in Our Midst: The Hidden Influence in Our Everyday Lives by Margaret Thaler Singer with Janja Lalich (1995, Jossey-Bass) 

Exit Counseling: A Family Intervention by Carol Giambalvo (1995, AFF

Recovery from Cults: Help for Victims of Psychological and Spiritual Abuse, edited by Michael D. Langone (1993, Norton) 

The Wrong Way Home by Arthur J. Deikman (1990, Beacon) Deikman's spin on cult behavior in America is worth a look. 

How to Think About Weird Things: Critical Thinking for a New Age by Theodore Schick, Jr. and Lewis Vaughn, 1995. 

Why God Won't Go Away:Brain Science and the Biology of Belief by Andrew Newberg, M.D., Eugene D'Aquili, M.D., and Vince Rause, 2002. 

Magic or Medicine?: An Investigation of Healing and Healers by Dr. Robert Buckman & Karl Sabbagh (Prometheus, 1995) 

The Guru Papers: Masks of Authoritarian Power by Joel Kramer and Diana Alstad (1993, North Atlantic Books) 

Influence: The New Psychology of Modern Persuasion by Robert B. Cialdini (1984, Quill) 

Dangerous Persuaders: An expose of gurus, personal development courses and cults, and how they operate in Australia by Louise Samways (Penguin, 1994) 

When God Becomes a Drug: Breaking the Chains of Religious Addiction and Abuse by Fr.Lee Booth (1991): uses addiction model and "12 Step" recovery. 

Psychic Dictatorship in America by Gerald Bryan (1940). Original expose of I AM Activity, 'parent' group to CUT. 

A Piece of Blue Sky: Scientology, Dianetics and L. Ron Hubbard Exposed by Jon Atack (1990, Lyle Stuart) 

Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism by Robert J. Lifton (1989, University of North Carolina Press) 

TM and Cult Mania by M.A. Persinger, N.J. Carrey, & L.A. Suess (1980, Christopher)
Understanding the New Age by Russell Chandler (1993, Zondervan). A mix of skeptical and Christian criticisms. 

When Prophecy Fails: A Social and Psychological Study of a Modern Group that Predicted the Destruction of the World by L. Festinger, H.W. Riecken, & S. Schachter (1956, Harper) 

Madame Blavatsky’s Baboon by Peter Washington (Schocken Books, 1995). Informative expose of the western guru tradition: Gurdjieff, Krishnamurti, JG Bennett, R Steiner and others. 

Karma Cola: Marketing the Mystic East by Gita Mehta (Vintage, 1994) highly recommended
The Fringes of Reason, edited by Ted Schultz (A Whole Earth Catalogue: Harmony Books 1989)

The Mother of God by Luna Tarlo (Plover, 1997) expose of Andrew Cohen.
Skeptical Inquirer (All volumes) 

Age of Propaganda: Everyday Use and Abuse of Persuasion by Pratkanis & Aronson
My Father's Guru: A Journey through Spirituality and Disillusion by Jeffrey M. Masson (Addison Wesley, 1993). Author grew up with charlatan Paul Brunton as his household guru. 

Carlos Castaneda, Academic Opportunism and the Psychedelic Sixties by Jay Courtney Fikes (Vic., Canada: Millenia Press, 1993). Excellent insights into Castaneda's shallow theatre of shamanism by a true anthropologist 

Amazing Grace by Kathleen Norris (Riverhead Books, 1998). Thoughtful essays for struggling Christians who want to understand the Gospel walk outside of cult-think. 

A River Sutra by Gita Mehta (Nan A. Talese, 1993) By the author of Karma Cola. In this beautiful story, Mehta captures an essence of Hindu holiness, esp in the "Naga Baba" character. 

Our Lady of Guadalupe: The Origins and Sources of a Mexican National Symbol, 1531-1797 by Stafford Poole, C.M. (U of Arizona, 1996). With the glut of Marian visions today, this insightful study shows how cultures can create miracles out of "whole cloth," so to speak. 

Invasion From Mars by Hadley Cantril (Harper Torchbooks, 1966 (original, 1940). 

"A Study in the Psychology of Panic" is the subtitle of this look into the Orson Wells infamous "Martian Invasion" broadcast, Hallowe'en night, 1938, when many committed suicide and thousands panicked.